In-reply-to » #QOTD : If you could redesign a fundamental internet protocol from scratch, which one would you choose and how would you improve it?

@mckinley@twtxt.net Oh well in that case, Iā€™d redesign the IRC protocol to be more like a combination of what Signal is today but with SMTP like capabilities. A bit like what weā€™ve been trying to do with Salty IM ā€“ So-called ā€œfederatedā€ instant messaging, with group support and fully e2e encrypted.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » One of the super frustrating things about this: I have to write lots of documents, but I am required to use horrendous software to do that. It cannot even number sections automatically, nor can you insert cross-references to other sections. Simple stuff like that. It all has to be done manually.

I spent some more time with StarOffice 3.1 and it is indeed a bit clunky (of course it is, itā€™s from 1996). For example, a table of contents does not update automatically ā€“ you have to delete it and re-insert it. Sometimes it has graphical glitches. Font rendering isnā€™t too great.

And yet, I wish we would use this instead of $the_other_thing at work. Itā€™s much faster (on my Pentium 133!) and more featureful. šŸ«¤ (Or, you know, StarOfficeā€™s modern descendant: LibreOffice.)

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » One thing Iā€™ve learned from locking down my Android phone (see #pknsrda):

Okay, GPS performance has degraded a lot over the last few days.

  • Time to first fix is a couple of minutes now, instead of 5-30 seconds.
  • Accuracy is reduced greatly, probably because the phone can one lock on to about 6-12 satellites, this used to be around 30 satellites.

In theory and under good conditions, you need 4 satellites to get a fix. But in reality, there are rarely ā€œgood conditionsā€, there are always buildings, hills, or trees nearby, so you need as many satellites as you can possibly get.

Itā€™s not completely useless (yet), but itā€™s not great. I think Iā€™m gonna lift some firewall restrictions. šŸ«¤

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » #QOTD : If you could redesign a fundamental internet protocol from scratch, which one would you choose and how would you improve it?

@mckinley@twtxt.net Define ā€œfundamental internet protocolā€? Do you mean fundamental things that make the Internet work like IP, TCP, DNS, various routing protocols like BGP, OSPF, etc? Or things more like application protocols like IRC, HTTP, etc?

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Anyone got a link to a robots.txt that ā€œblocksā€ all the ā€œAIā€ stuff?

ā€¦ or maybe I should do this based on allowlisting rather than blocklisting. šŸ¤” Only allow a couple of bots that I think are fine ā€¦

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » One of the super frustrating things about this: I have to write lots of documents, but I am required to use horrendous software to do that. It cannot even number sections automatically, nor can you insert cross-references to other sections. Simple stuff like that. It all has to be done manually.

I was able to dig up StarOffice 3.1, which I used in the 1990ā€™ies on Windows 95. This was the highlight of my day. šŸ„° As you can see in the photo below, this CD includes a version for Windows 3.1, 95/NT ā€“ and OS/2! How cool is that? My CD back then did not have the OS/2 version.

StarWriter of StarOffice 3.1 can do a lot of the stuff that Iā€™m missing in the tool at work. Like automatic numbering of sections/chapters and cross-references to other parts of the document. Essential basic stuff like that.

All the following screenshots are from QEMU VMs (OS/2 2.1, Windows 3.11, and Windows 98), but I think Iā€™m gonna install this on my real OS/2 Warp 4 box soon. šŸ§“

https://movq.de/v/eebbe648a5/

What really blew my mind is this feature, though: You can rearrange your documentā€™s structure using drag-and-drop. Hereā€™s a demo (Window 2000):

https://movq.de/v/67523d0d3f/so31.mp4

I really, really wish the tool at work would have a feature like that. It would have saved me so much time already. šŸ˜­

ā¤‹ Read More

Interesting. Thanks! And thank you for replying. :) Indeed, I donā€™t check for mention with twtxt. To me, twtxt is to share, not to talk: there is my email commented at the top of my #twtxt.txt for this purpose. Trying to create discussions with twtxt is nonsens : there are much better tools to do so (email, xmpp, ā€¦) @@aelaraji.com @@im-in.space

ā¤‹ Read More

Cā€™est fou toutes ces requĆŖtes spĆ©cfiques Ć  #dokuwiki qui persistent mĆŖme si je nā€™ai plus dokuwiki. Les diff et que sais-jeā€¦ Les bots adorent :/

ā¤‹ Read More

Iā€™m looking for wallpapers matching a color palette. Is there any tool to do so? I found the opposite, picture to palette, but not palette to picture :/

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » I've ripped off it's GPU about a year ago to rescue another computer ... Now I'm stuck with only SSH to play with it. Since it came with just a VGA port for display and my monitor takes all but THAT!

Whatā€™s all of this about? one may askā€¦

Well Iā€™ve been itching to toy around with a BSD on actual hardware and away from the comfort of VMs. NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSDā€¦ It doesnā€™t matter. I just want to ā€œMake it feelā€¦ Make it feel alive AGAIN!ā€

Image

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Planning a file back up from an old machine that's been sitting in the corner gathering dust... Because I know ! I'm about to eff it up, BIIIIG Time ! šŸ˜‚

Iā€™ve ripped off itā€™s GPU about a year ago to rescue another computer ā€¦ Now Iā€™m stuck with only SSH to play with it. Since it came with just a VGA port for display and my monitor takes all but THAT!

ā¤‹ Read More

Planning a file back up from an old machine thatā€™s been sitting in the corner gathering dustā€¦ Because I know ! Iā€™m about to eff it up, BIIIIG Time ! šŸ˜‚

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Thinking about disabling the two extra buttons for ā€œforwardā€ and ā€œbackwardā€ on my mouse, because todayā€™s websites donā€™t support this anymore, and itā€™d safe me the constant moments of ā€œoh for fuckā€™s sakeā€. šŸ™„

Hahaha, what an evil idea, @aelaraji@aelaraji.com. :-D

@movq@www.uninformativ.de At work, I mostly open Jira tickets in new tabs and donā€™t navigate them. But yeah, GitHub unsurprisingly fucked up here. One more reason not to use it. ;-)

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Cut my following list down to just a mere ~47 feeds. ~11 rss/news feeds, 23 local feeds from my pod, and 13 external feeds.

@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, I was just surprised by that low number, because I still have 126 feeds in my list. Buuuuuut I guess I could clean that up a bit as well. šŸ„“

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Cut my following list down to just a mere ~47 feeds. ~11 rss/news feeds, 23 local feeds from my pod, and 13 external feeds.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de To be fair Twtxt has always been quite niche. Yarn picked up interest a bit a few years back, but then things died down a bit. I built yarnd for me, I continue to use it and improve it every now and again. But I guess the only uses weā€™ll continue to see and that includes new folks are folks that give a shit about simple things, and see value in a slow, privacy focused medium? šŸ¤”

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Thinking about disabling the two extra buttons for ā€œforwardā€ and ā€œbackwardā€ on my mouse, because todayā€™s websites donā€™t support this anymore, and itā€™d safe me the constant moments of ā€œoh for fuckā€™s sakeā€. šŸ™„

@aelaraji@aelaraji.com lol, yeah, that would be great šŸ˜‚

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org @mckinley@mckinley.cc Huh, I envy you. šŸ˜… I was browsing my GitHub stars, clicked Next a couple of times and then hit the back button on my mouse. Boom, I donā€™t get back to the previous page but to my profile page: https://github.com/vain?tab=stars

At work, it is absolutely pointless to expect forward/backward to work. Almost everything breaks. Maybe some older Jira still works, but thatā€™s about it.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Thinking about disabling the two extra buttons for ā€œforwardā€ and ā€œbackwardā€ on my mouse, because todayā€™s websites donā€™t support this anymore, and itā€™d safe me the constant moments of ā€œoh for fuckā€™s sakeā€. šŸ™„

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Classically navigating through the history still works perfectly fine on most (if not all) websites I visit.

ā¤‹ Read More