In-reply-to » So, uh, did anyone but me notice that the last character of a twt hash is always either an a or a q? Which is the natural consequence of taking the last digit in the base32 representation of a 256-bit hash -- 256 is not evenly divisible by 5 ! That final character is made up of one bit of actual information and 4 bits of padding.

In any case, yes Content addressing can break threads when the original content is edited that’s for sure, however we’ve since agreed and realized that technically speaking, we can actually identify from a clients perspective, whether an edit took place.

⤋ Read More